Vol. 41 No. 3; Winter 2016-2017
Is Chinese Nationalism Rising? Evidence from Beijing
Alastair Iain Johnston
Many commentators claim that rising Chinese nationalism has pushed China’s leadership toward aggressive foreign policies. Responses to the Beijing Area Study survey from 1998 to 2015, however, undermine this claim. Factors such as elite opinion, security dilemma dynamics, and organizational interests better explain China’s bellicose behaviors.
Deterrence and Dissuasion in Cyberspace
Joseph S. Nye
Can states deter adversaries in cyberspace? Analogies drawn from nuclear deterrence mislead; nuclear deterrence aims for total prevention, whereas states cannot prevent every cyberattack. Additionally, even though identifying the source of a cyberattack can be difficult, attribution problems do not hinder three major forms of cyber deterrence: denial, entanglement, and normative taboos.
What Is the Cyber Offense-Defense Balance? Conceptions, Causes, and Assessment
Rebecca Slayton
Does cyberspace favor the offense, as many analysts and policymakers claim? Three factors undermine cyber offensive advantage. A cyber operation’s value, not just its cost, affects the offense-defense balance. Second, defenders can shift the balance in their favor by improving organizational capabilities. Third, attacking physical infrastructure is far more challenging than targeting information networks.
Strategies of Nuclear Proliferation: How States Pursue the Bomb
Vipin Narang
Which nuclear proliferation strategies are available, and how can they be thwarted? States’ proliferation efforts—particularly India’s—show how proliferators choose among four possible strategies: hedging, sprinting, hiding, and sheltered pursuit. Each strategy has flaws that can be exploited to prevent proliferation.
Learning to Deter: Deterrence Failure and Success in the Israel-Hezbollah Conflict, 2006–16
Daniel Sobelman
Israel and Hezbollah’s interactions before and after the 2006 Lebanon War highlight the sources of deterrence stability. Israel and Hezbollah have learned to apply rational deterrence theory, carefully communicating capabilities and resolve. This history also illustrates how a weak actor can deter a stronger adversary by minimizing its own vulnerability and maximizing that of its opponent.
"International Security Journal Highlights." Belfer Center Newsletter. Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School. (Spring 2017).