Discussion Paper - Harvard Project on Climate Agreements
Linking Heterogeneous Climate Policies (Consistent with the Paris Agreement)
Abstract
The Paris Agreement has achieved one of two key necessary conditions for ultimate success—a broad base of participation among the countries of the world. But another key necessary condition has yet to be achieved—adequate collective ambition of the individual nationally determined contributions. How can climate negotiators provide a structure that will include incentives to increase ambition over time? An important part of the answer can be international linkage of regional, national, and sub-national policies—that is, formal recognition of emission reductions undertaken in another jurisdiction for the purpose of meeting a Party’s own mitigation objectives. A central challenge is how to facilitate such linkage in the context of the very great heterogeneity that characterizes climate policies along five dimensions: type of policy instrument; level of government jurisdiction; status of that jurisdiction under the Paris Agreement; nature of the policy instrument’s target; and the nature, along several dimensions, of each Party’s Nationally Determined Contribution. We consider such heterogeneity among policies, and identify which linkages of various combinations of characteristics are feasible; of these, which are most promising; and what accounting mechanisms would make the operation of respective linkages consistent with the Paris Agreement.
Acknowledgement
The Harvard Project on Climate Agreements is grateful to the Enel Foundation and the Enel Endowment for Environmental Economics at Harvard University for generous support of a series of annual discussion papers on climate-change policy and related topics in energy policy, of which this paper is the sixth.
Author Affiliations
Michael A. Mehling, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Gilbert E. Metcalf, Tufts University
Robert Stavins, Harvard University
For more information on this publication:
Please contact
Harvard Project on Climate Agreements
For Academic Citation:
Mehling, Michael A, Gilbert E. Metcalf and Robert N. Stavins. “Linking Heterogeneous Climate Policies (Consistent with the Paris Agreement).” Discussion Paper, ES 17-6, Harvard Project on Climate Agreements, October 2017.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
News
- Harvard Project on Climate Agreements
Cooperation in East Asia to Address Climate Change
Report
- Harvard Project on Climate Agreements
Market Mechanisms and the Paris Agreement
Discussion Paper
- Harvard Project on Climate Agreements, Belfer Center
Facilitating Linkage of Heterogeneous Regional, National, and Sub-National Climate Policies Through a Future International Agreement
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Report
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs
David Petraeus on Strategic Leadership
Report
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
NATO at Seventy: An Alliance in Crisis
Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Attacking Artificial Intelligence: AI’s Security Vulnerability and What Policymakers Can Do About It
Abstract
The Paris Agreement has achieved one of two key necessary conditions for ultimate success—a broad base of participation among the countries of the world. But another key necessary condition has yet to be achieved—adequate collective ambition of the individual nationally determined contributions. How can climate negotiators provide a structure that will include incentives to increase ambition over time? An important part of the answer can be international linkage of regional, national, and sub-national policies—that is, formal recognition of emission reductions undertaken in another jurisdiction for the purpose of meeting a Party’s own mitigation objectives. A central challenge is how to facilitate such linkage in the context of the very great heterogeneity that characterizes climate policies along five dimensions: type of policy instrument; level of government jurisdiction; status of that jurisdiction under the Paris Agreement; nature of the policy instrument’s target; and the nature, along several dimensions, of each Party’s Nationally Determined Contribution. We consider such heterogeneity among policies, and identify which linkages of various combinations of characteristics are feasible; of these, which are most promising; and what accounting mechanisms would make the operation of respective linkages consistent with the Paris Agreement.
Acknowledgement
The Harvard Project on Climate Agreements is grateful to the Enel Foundation and the Enel Endowment for Environmental Economics at Harvard University for generous support of a series of annual discussion papers on climate-change policy and related topics in energy policy, of which this paper is the sixth.
Author Affiliations
Michael A. Mehling, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Gilbert E. Metcalf, Tufts University
Robert Stavins, Harvard University
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
News - Harvard Project on Climate Agreements
Cooperation in East Asia to Address Climate Change
Report - Harvard Project on Climate Agreements
Market Mechanisms and the Paris Agreement
Discussion Paper - Harvard Project on Climate Agreements, Belfer Center
Facilitating Linkage of Heterogeneous Regional, National, and Sub-National Climate Policies Through a Future International Agreement
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Report - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs
David Petraeus on Strategic Leadership
Report - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
NATO at Seventy: An Alliance in Crisis
Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Attacking Artificial Intelligence: AI’s Security Vulnerability and What Policymakers Can Do About It