Journal Article - Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament
Nuclear Hotlines: Origins, Evolution, Applications
Abstract
Soviet and American leaders learned during the Cuban Missile Crisis of October 1962 that inadequate communication raised perilous risks and dangers in the nuclear age. The US–Soviet Hotline was created soon thereafter, in 1963, and has operated continuously ever since. It was intended to provide a quick, reliable, confidential, ever-ready communications between heads of state in the event of crisis or war. Strategists came to realize that urgent and effective communication was essential not only for preventing unwanted escalation in crisis, but also in limiting war or terminating war — all profoundly important in an age marked by large accumulations of nuclear weapons. Though they can be misused by malign actors or employed by states to convey threats rather than reassurances, hotlines represent an emergency mechanism that sits astride the paths to nuclear war — an insurance policy worth having. Not only has the original Soviet-American Hotline been preserved and modernized but the hotline model has been adapted by other nuclear pairings and in conflict-prone regional settings. Hotlines remain a prudent, low-cost preparation that could prove essential in the event of a crisis that seems to be slipping out of control.
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament.
For more information on this publication:
Belfer Communications Office
For Academic Citation:
Miller, Steven E. "Nuclear Hotlines: Origins, Evolution, Applications." Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament, vol. 4. no. sup1. (2021): 176–191 .
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions
- Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
Biden to Putin in Geneva: There's a New Sheriff in Town.
Analysis & Opinions
- Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
The Postponement of the NPT Review Conference. Antagonisms, Conflicts and Nuclear Risks after the Pandemic
Policy Brief
- Asia Pacific Leadership Network for Nuclear Non-proliferation and Disarmament; Toda Peace Institute
Nuclear Battleground: Debating the US 2018 Nuclear Posture Review
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
- Belfer Center Spring 2023 Newsletter
Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Attacking Artificial Intelligence: AI’s Security Vulnerability and What Policymakers Can Do About It
Analysis & Opinions
- New Straits Times
Gorbachev and the End of the Cold War
Abstract
Soviet and American leaders learned during the Cuban Missile Crisis of October 1962 that inadequate communication raised perilous risks and dangers in the nuclear age. The US–Soviet Hotline was created soon thereafter, in 1963, and has operated continuously ever since. It was intended to provide a quick, reliable, confidential, ever-ready communications between heads of state in the event of crisis or war. Strategists came to realize that urgent and effective communication was essential not only for preventing unwanted escalation in crisis, but also in limiting war or terminating war — all profoundly important in an age marked by large accumulations of nuclear weapons. Though they can be misused by malign actors or employed by states to convey threats rather than reassurances, hotlines represent an emergency mechanism that sits astride the paths to nuclear war — an insurance policy worth having. Not only has the original Soviet-American Hotline been preserved and modernized but the hotline model has been adapted by other nuclear pairings and in conflict-prone regional settings. Hotlines remain a prudent, low-cost preparation that could prove essential in the event of a crisis that seems to be slipping out of control.
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament.Miller, Steven E. "Nuclear Hotlines: Origins, Evolution, Applications." Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament, vol. 4. no. sup1. (2021): 176–191 .
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions - Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
Biden to Putin in Geneva: There's a New Sheriff in Town.
Analysis & Opinions - Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
The Postponement of the NPT Review Conference. Antagonisms, Conflicts and Nuclear Risks after the Pandemic
Policy Brief - Asia Pacific Leadership Network for Nuclear Non-proliferation and Disarmament; Toda Peace Institute
Nuclear Battleground: Debating the US 2018 Nuclear Posture Review
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
-Belfer Center Spring 2023 Newsletter
Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Attacking Artificial Intelligence: AI’s Security Vulnerability and What Policymakers Can Do About It
Analysis & Opinions - New Straits Times
Gorbachev and the End of the Cold War