Journal Article - Quarterly Journal: International Security
Posturing for Peace? Pakistan's Nuclear Postures and South Asian Stability
Summary
A probe of various regional power nuclear postures reveals that such postures, rather than simply the acquisition of nuclear weapons, can have differential effects on deterrence and stability dynamics. The India-Pakistan dyad is a useful candidate for exploring these various effects because the three regional power nuclear postures—catalytic, assured retaliation, and asymmetric escalation-have interacted with each other in South Asia. In particular, Pakistan's shift from a catalytic posture to an asymmetric escalation posture in 1998 against a continuous Indian assured retaliation posture allows the effects of nuclear posture to be isolated in an enduring rivalry in which many variables can be held constant. The asymmetric escalation posture may be "deterrence optimal" for Pakistan, suggesting that nuclear postures do have different effects on conflict dynamics, but it has also enabled Pakistan to more aggressively pursue longstanding revisionist preferences in India, triggering more frequent and intense crises on the subcontinent. Furthermore, the command and control procedures that Pakistan undertakes to make its asymmetric escalation posture credible amplify this instability. These procedures generate risks to the safety and security of Pakistan's nuclear assets, both at present and as India and Pakistan continue to dynamically evolve nuclear and conventional postures. The conclusions for South Asian and international security of this reality are grim.
For more information on this publication:
Please contact
International Security
For Academic Citation:
Vipin Narang. “Posturing for Peace? Pakistan's Nuclear Postures and South Asian Stability.” Quarterly Journal: International Security, vol. 34. no. 3. (Winter 2009/10): 38-78 .
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions
- Asia Pacific Leadership Network for Nuclear Non-proliferation and Disarmament
An Accidental Missile Launch and a Lesson for Indian Communications
Report
- Managing the Atom Project, Belfer Center
The Strategic Postures of China and India: A Visual Guide
Policy Brief
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
India's New Nuclear Thinking: Counterforce, Crises, and Consequences
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Saudi First
Magazine Article
- Der Tagesspiegel
Background: Ivan Arreguín-Toft
Analysis & Opinions
- Foreign Policy
The Morality of Ukraine's War Is Very Murky
Summary
A probe of various regional power nuclear postures reveals that such postures, rather than simply the acquisition of nuclear weapons, can have differential effects on deterrence and stability dynamics. The India-Pakistan dyad is a useful candidate for exploring these various effects because the three regional power nuclear postures—catalytic, assured retaliation, and asymmetric escalation-have interacted with each other in South Asia. In particular, Pakistan's shift from a catalytic posture to an asymmetric escalation posture in 1998 against a continuous Indian assured retaliation posture allows the effects of nuclear posture to be isolated in an enduring rivalry in which many variables can be held constant. The asymmetric escalation posture may be "deterrence optimal" for Pakistan, suggesting that nuclear postures do have different effects on conflict dynamics, but it has also enabled Pakistan to more aggressively pursue longstanding revisionist preferences in India, triggering more frequent and intense crises on the subcontinent. Furthermore, the command and control procedures that Pakistan undertakes to make its asymmetric escalation posture credible amplify this instability. These procedures generate risks to the safety and security of Pakistan's nuclear assets, both at present and as India and Pakistan continue to dynamically evolve nuclear and conventional postures. The conclusions for South Asian and international security of this reality are grim.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions - Asia Pacific Leadership Network for Nuclear Non-proliferation and Disarmament
An Accidental Missile Launch and a Lesson for Indian Communications
Report - Managing the Atom Project, Belfer Center
The Strategic Postures of China and India: A Visual Guide
Policy Brief - Quarterly Journal: International Security
India's New Nuclear Thinking: Counterforce, Crises, and Consequences
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Saudi First
Magazine Article - Der Tagesspiegel
Background: Ivan Arreguín-Toft
Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Policy
The Morality of Ukraine's War Is Very Murky