Discussion Paper - Harvard Project on Climate Agreements, Belfer Center

A Voting Architecture for the Governance of Free-Driver Externalities, with Application to Geoengineering

    Author:
  • Martin L. Weitzman
| May 2013

Abstract

Climate change is a global "free rider" problem because significant abatement of greenhouse gases is an expensive public good requiring international cooperation to apportion compliance among states. But it is also a global "free driver" problem because geoengineering the stratosphere with reflective particles to block incoming solar radiation is so cheap that it could essentially be undertaken unilaterally by one state perceiving itself to be in peril. This paper develops the main features of a "free driver" externality in a simple model based on the asymmetric consequences of type-I and type-II errors. I propose a social-choice decision architecture embodying the solution concept of a supermajority voting rule and derive its basic properties. In the model this supermajority voting rule attains the socially optimal cooperative solution, which is a new theoretical result around which the paper is built.


Martin L. Weitzman, Harvard University

Downloads

For more information on this publication: Please contact Harvard Project on Climate Agreements
For Academic Citation: Weitzman, Martin L.. “A Voting Architecture for the Governance of Free-Driver Externalities, with Application to Geoengineering.” Discussion Paper, 2013-55, Harvard Project on Climate Agreements, Belfer Center, May 2013.

The Author

Martin L. Weitzman

Recommended
In the Spotlight
RSS
By 2050, DACCS appears likely to remove only about 1% of current emissions of fossil carbon, making only a small contribution to meeting 2050 net zero targets, write Mohammed Al-Juaied and Adam Whitmore.
As much as we laud LBJ’s political prowess in moving domestic legislation, some of those same attributes led him and the nation deeper into the jungles of Vietnam, write Fredrik Logevall and Julian Zelizer.
The most likely result of a Trump administration for Ukraine may be radically diminished U.S. support, causing Russia to make new battlefield gains and perhaps an imposed peace, writes Anatol Lieven in Russia Matters.
Most Viewed

Tags