Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Policy
The Donald vs. the Blob
The foreign-policy establishment is backing Hillary Clinton. And that may not be such a bad thing for Trump.
Barring a bizarre and unforeseen turn of events, next November American voters will have to choose Hillary Rodham Clinton or Donald Trump to be the nation's 45th president. The two candidates could not be more different: female versus male; longtime public servant versus self-absorbed private businessman; Democrat versus Republican; unapologetic liberal internationalist versus xenophobic nativist; uber-cautious, poll-driven politico versus vulgar and impulsive bomb-thrower. It's quite a choice.
Their campaigns could not be more different either, especially when it comes to foreign policy. The Clinton campaign has already assembled a "massive brain trust" of policy wonks and former government officials, including Michèle Flournoy, Nicholas Burns, Madeleine Albright, Jake Sullivan, Derek Chollet, Tamara Wittes, Phil Gordon, Michael McFaul, and many, many more. As befits a former secretary of state, former senator, and former first lady, her foreign-policy machine is the living embodiment of the mainstream Foreign-Policy Establishment....
Continue reading (log in may be required): http://foreignpolicy.com/2016/05/16/the-donald-vs-the-blob-hillary-clinton-election/
For more information on this publication:
Belfer Communications Office
For Academic Citation:
Walt, Stephen M..“The Donald vs. the Blob.” Foreign Policy, May 16, 2016.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions
- Foreign Policy
Biden Needs to Play the Nationalism Card Right Now
Analysis & Opinions
- Foreign Policy
Is the Blob Really Blameless?
Journal Article
- Terrorism and Political Violence
Book Review: The Taliban at War: 2001–2018
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy
The foreign-policy establishment is backing Hillary Clinton. And that may not be such a bad thing for Trump.
Barring a bizarre and unforeseen turn of events, next November American voters will have to choose Hillary Rodham Clinton or Donald Trump to be the nation's 45th president. The two candidates could not be more different: female versus male; longtime public servant versus self-absorbed private businessman; Democrat versus Republican; unapologetic liberal internationalist versus xenophobic nativist; uber-cautious, poll-driven politico versus vulgar and impulsive bomb-thrower. It's quite a choice.
Their campaigns could not be more different either, especially when it comes to foreign policy. The Clinton campaign has already assembled a "massive brain trust" of policy wonks and former government officials, including Michèle Flournoy, Nicholas Burns, Madeleine Albright, Jake Sullivan, Derek Chollet, Tamara Wittes, Phil Gordon, Michael McFaul, and many, many more. As befits a former secretary of state, former senator, and former first lady, her foreign-policy machine is the living embodiment of the mainstream Foreign-Policy Establishment....
Continue reading (log in may be required): http://foreignpolicy.com/2016/05/16/the-donald-vs-the-blob-hillary-clinton-election/
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Policy
Biden Needs to Play the Nationalism Card Right Now
Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Policy
Is the Blob Really Blameless?
Journal Article - Terrorism and Political Violence
Book Review: The Taliban at War: 2001–2018
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief - Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy


