Journal Article - Strategic Trade Review
Tomcat and Mouse: Iranian Illicit Procurement of U.S. Legacy Military Technologies, 1979–2016
Abstract
Since the 1979 revolution, Iran has sought to illicitly procure parts for the U.S. origin fighter aircraft sold to the country under the rule of the Shah. The U.S. has taken steps to quash this trade—these efforts have constituted a relatively large proportion of U.S. export control enforcement over the past near-to-four decades. This paper provides insights into the smuggling rings which have sought to procure these parts for Iran’s Air Force, seeking to draw conclusions regarding the evolving shape of these networks and the types of actors involved in this trade. It also provides a snapshot of U.S. export control enforcement efforts. In doing so, the paper seeks to contribute to the limited existing literature on Iranian illicit procurement of military goods. This area has received less attention than illicit procurement efforts for the country’s nuclear or missile programs.
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.
For more information on this publication:
Belfer Communications Office
For Academic Citation:
Salisbury, Daniel. "Tomcat and Mouse: Iranian Illicit Procurement of U.S. Legacy Military Technologies, 1979–2016." Strategic Trade Review, vol. 3. no. 5. (Autumn 2017): 25–46 .
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Journal Article
- International Security
A “Nuclear Umbrella” for Ukraine? Precedents and Possibilities for Postwar European Security
Analysis & Opinions
- Russia Matters
Mutiny in Russia: What Happened, What’s Next and What To Be Thankful For
Journal Article
- International Journal of Nuclear Security
Assessing Nuclear Security Risks in Pakistan
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions
- New Straits Times
Gorbachev and the End of the Cold War
Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Attacking Artificial Intelligence: AI’s Security Vulnerability and What Policymakers Can Do About It
Analysis & Opinions
- Foreign Policy
Why the U.S. Should Not Ban TikTok
Abstract
Since the 1979 revolution, Iran has sought to illicitly procure parts for the U.S. origin fighter aircraft sold to the country under the rule of the Shah. The U.S. has taken steps to quash this trade—these efforts have constituted a relatively large proportion of U.S. export control enforcement over the past near-to-four decades. This paper provides insights into the smuggling rings which have sought to procure these parts for Iran’s Air Force, seeking to draw conclusions regarding the evolving shape of these networks and the types of actors involved in this trade. It also provides a snapshot of U.S. export control enforcement efforts. In doing so, the paper seeks to contribute to the limited existing literature on Iranian illicit procurement of military goods. This area has received less attention than illicit procurement efforts for the country’s nuclear or missile programs.
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.Salisbury, Daniel. "Tomcat and Mouse: Iranian Illicit Procurement of U.S. Legacy Military Technologies, 1979–2016." Strategic Trade Review, vol. 3. no. 5. (Autumn 2017): 25–46 .
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Journal Article - International Security
A “Nuclear Umbrella” for Ukraine? Precedents and Possibilities for Postwar European Security
Analysis & Opinions - Russia Matters
Mutiny in Russia: What Happened, What’s Next and What To Be Thankful For
Journal Article - International Journal of Nuclear Security
Assessing Nuclear Security Risks in Pakistan
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions - New Straits Times
Gorbachev and the End of the Cold War
Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Attacking Artificial Intelligence: AI’s Security Vulnerability and What Policymakers Can Do About It
Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Policy
Why the U.S. Should Not Ban TikTok