Policy Brief - Harvard Project on Climate Agreements, Belfer Center
Implications of the Paris Agreement for Carbon Dioxide Removal and Solar Geoengineering
The Paris Agreement ("Agreement")1 has been widely lauded as a major step forward in multilateral efforts to address global climate change. Its bottom-up approach based on national pledges, its universal scope entailing substantive commitments by both developed and developing countries, its ambitious climate targets, and other aspects of the Agreement have generated extensive discussion, drawing praise from many and eliciting criticism from others (e.g., Bodansky, 2015; Gillis, 2015; Victor, 2015; Winkler, 2015).
We survey the implications of the revamped climate policy regime for carbon removal and solar geoengineering, hereafter referred to using the common acronyms carbon dioxide removal (CDR) and solar radiation management (SRM). While a few analyses have examined the post-Paris role of CDR (Lewis, 2015), there has been almost no analysis of the implications for SRM. We first review the Agreement before turning to an examination of its implications for CDR and SRM....
The entire Viewpoint may be downloaded below.
1The text of the Agreement and accompanying COP Decision may be found at: http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/10a01.pdf.
Joshua B. Horton, Harvard Kennedy School
David W. Keith, Harvard University
Matthias Honegger, Perspectives Climate Change
Viewpoints present policy proposals, considered opinions, and commentary by distinguished policymakers, leaders from business and non-governmental organizations, and scholars. The Harvard Project on Climate Agreements does not advocate any specific climate-change policy proposals. Statements and views expressed in Viewpoints are solely those of the authors and do not imply endorsement by Harvard University, the Harvard Kennedy School, or the Harvard Project on Climate Agreements.
For more information on this publication:
Please contact
Harvard Project on Climate Agreements
For Academic Citation:
Horton, Joshua B., David W. Keith, and Matthias Honegger. “Implications of the Paris Agreement for Carbon Dioxide Removal and Solar Geoengineering.” Policy Brief, Harvard Project on Climate Agreements, Belfer Center, July 2016.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Event Debrief: Social Cost of Carbon Could be Significantly Underestimated, Says Environmental Economist Frances Moore
Audio
- Harvard Environmental Economics Program
Previewing COP 28: A Conversation with Nat Keohane
News
- Harvard Project on Climate Agreements
Harvard Project to Conduct Panel on Methane Emissions Abatement at COP-28
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
The Real-Life Events of "Oppenheimer"
Policy Brief
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
Oil, Conflict, and U.S. National Interests
Report
- Commission on America's National Interests
America's National Interests: A Report from The Commission on America's National Interests, 2000
The Paris Agreement ("Agreement")1 has been widely lauded as a major step forward in multilateral efforts to address global climate change. Its bottom-up approach based on national pledges, its universal scope entailing substantive commitments by both developed and developing countries, its ambitious climate targets, and other aspects of the Agreement have generated extensive discussion, drawing praise from many and eliciting criticism from others (e.g., Bodansky, 2015; Gillis, 2015; Victor, 2015; Winkler, 2015).
We survey the implications of the revamped climate policy regime for carbon removal and solar geoengineering, hereafter referred to using the common acronyms carbon dioxide removal (CDR) and solar radiation management (SRM). While a few analyses have examined the post-Paris role of CDR (Lewis, 2015), there has been almost no analysis of the implications for SRM. We first review the Agreement before turning to an examination of its implications for CDR and SRM....
The entire Viewpoint may be downloaded below.
1The text of the Agreement and accompanying COP Decision may be found at: http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/10a01.pdf.
Joshua B. Horton, Harvard Kennedy School
David W. Keith, Harvard University
Matthias Honegger, Perspectives Climate Change
Viewpoints present policy proposals, considered opinions, and commentary by distinguished policymakers, leaders from business and non-governmental organizations, and scholars. The Harvard Project on Climate Agreements does not advocate any specific climate-change policy proposals. Statements and views expressed in Viewpoints are solely those of the authors and do not imply endorsement by Harvard University, the Harvard Kennedy School, or the Harvard Project on Climate Agreements.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Event Debrief: Social Cost of Carbon Could be Significantly Underestimated, Says Environmental Economist Frances Moore
Audio - Harvard Environmental Economics Program
Previewing COP 28: A Conversation with Nat Keohane
News - Harvard Project on Climate Agreements
Harvard Project to Conduct Panel on Methane Emissions Abatement at COP-28
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
The Real-Life Events of "Oppenheimer"
Policy Brief - Quarterly Journal: International Security
Oil, Conflict, and U.S. National Interests
Report - Commission on America's National Interests
America's National Interests: A Report from The Commission on America's National Interests, 2000