Research, ideas, and leadership for a more secure, peaceful world

Article
from Annual Review of Energy and the Environment

Managing Military Uranium and Plutonium in the United States and the Former Soviet Union: Literature Cited

Published:

Related Programs

LITERATURE CITED

Bunn, Matthew, and John P. Holdren. "Managing Military Uranium and Plutonium in the United States and the Former Soviet Union." Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 22 (1997): 403-486.

  1. Gibbons JH. 1995. Fifty years after Trinity: working toward a happy ending. Presented at Symp. 50th Anniv. Trinity Test, July 16, Washington, DC
  2. National Academy of Sciences, Committee on International Security and Arms Control. 1997. The Future of U.S. Nuclear Weapons Policy. Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press
  3. The White House, Office of the Press Secretary. 1996. Removal of Nuclear Weapons from Belarus, Kazakhstan, and Ukraine, Nov. 27, Washington, DC
  4. The White House, Office of the Press Secretary. 1994. Joint Statement by the President of the Russian Federation and the President of the United States of America on Non-Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction and the Means of Their Delivery, Jan. 14, Washington, DC
  5. The White House, Office of the Press Secretary. 1994. Joint Statement on Strategic Stability and Nuclear Security by the Presidents of the United States and Russia, Sept. 28, Washington, DC
  6. The White House, Office of the Press Secretary. 1995. Joint Statement on the Transparency and Irreversibility of the Process of Reducing Nuclear Weapons, May 10, Washington, DC
  7. The White House, Office of the Press Secretary. 1997. Joint Statement on Parameters on Future Reductions in Nuclear Forces, Mar. 21, Washington, DC
  8. National Academy of Sciences, Committee on International Security and Arms Control. 1994. Management and Disposition of Excess Weapons Plutonium. Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press
  9. National Academy of Sciences, Panel on Reactor-Related Options. 1995. Management and Disposition of Excess Weapons Plutonium: Reactor-Related Options. Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press
  10. Holdren JP. 1995. Testimony in Loose Nukes, Nuclear Smuggling, and the Fissile-Material Problem in Russia and the NIS. Senate Comm. Foreign Relations, Subcomm. Europe. Aff. 104th Congr., 1st Sess., Aug. 23. S. Hrg. 104-253
  11. Bilateral Commission. 1996. Interim Report of the U.S.-Russian Independent Scientific Commission on Disposition of Excess Weapons Plutonium. Sept. Washington, DC: Off. Sci. Technol. Policy
  12. Bilateral Commission. 1997. Final Report of the U.S.-Russian Independent Scientific Commission on Disposition of Excess Weapons Plutonium. June. Washington, DC: Off. Sci. Technol. Policy
  13. von Hippel F. 1995. Fissile material security in the post Cold-War world. Phys. Today June:26-30
  14. Allison GT, Cote OR Jr, Falkenrath RA, Niller SE. 1995. Avoiding Nuclear Anarchy: Containing the Threat of Loose Russian Nuclear Weapons and Fissile Material. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  15. US Senate, Comm. Government Affairs, Permanent Subcomm. Investigations. 1996. Global Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction, 3 Vols. 104th Congr., 1st Sess., S. Hrg. 104-422
  16. Cochran TB. 1995. Dismantlement of nuclear weapons and disposal of fissile material from weapons. Presented at Conf. Econ. Soc. Dev. in former Soviet Union and Problem Nucl. Disarmament, Como, Italy
  17. Albright D, Berkhout F, Walker W. 1997. Plutonium and Highly Enriched Uranium 1996: World Inventories, Capabilities, and Policies. Oxford: SIPRI/Oxford Univ. Press
  18. Deutch J. 1996. The threat of nuclear diversion. Testimony before US Senate, Comm. Gov. Affairs, Permanent Sub-comm. Investigations. Global Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction, Part 2. 104th Congr., 2nd Sess. Mar. 20. S. Hrg. 104-422. 935 pp.
  19. Bukharin 0. 1996. Security of fissile materials in Russia. Annu. Rev. Energy Environ. 21:467-96
  20. Cochran TB. 1995. Safety and control of nuclear materials and nuclear weapons. Presented at Conf. Econ. Soc. Dev. in former Soviet Union and Problem Nucl. Disarmament, Como, Italy
  21. Bukharin O, Potter W. 1995. Potatoes were guarded better. Bull. At. Sci. May/June:46-50
  22. Stern J. 1996. U.S. assistance programs for improving MPC&A in the former Soviet Union. Nonprolif. Rev. 4(2):17-32
  23. Potter WC. 1995. Before the deluge? Assessing the threat of nuclear leakage from the post-Soviet states. Arms Control Today Oct:9-16
  24. Williams P, Woessner PN. 1996. The real threat of nuclear smuggling. Sci. Am. Jan:40-44
  25. US Dep. Energy, Office of Arms Control and Nonproliferation. 1997. Partnership for Nuclear Material Security. Washington, DC: DOE
  26. US Dep. Energy, Nuclear Materials Security Task Force. 1996. United States/Former Soviet Union Program of Cooperation on Nuclear Material Protection, Control, and Accounting. Washington, DC: DOE
  27. National Research Council, Committee on Dual Use Technologies Export Controls and Materials Protection Control and Accountability. 1997. Proliferation Concems: Assessing U.S. Efforts to Help Contain Nuclear and Other Dangerous Materials and Technologies in the Former Soviet Union. Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press
  28. Fetter S. 1996. Verifying nuclear disarmament. Occas. Pap. 29. Washington, DC: Henry L. Stimson Cent.
  29. von Hippel F, Sagdeev RZ, eds. 1990. Reversing the Arms Race: How to Achieve and Verify Deep Reductions in the Nuclear Arsenals. New York: Gordon & Breach Sci. Publ.
  30. Drell S, Callan C, Cornwall J, Dyson F, Eardley D, et al. 1993. Verification of Dismantlement of Nuclear Warheads and Controls on Nuclear Materials. JSR-92-331. McLean, VA: JASON-MITRE Corp.
  31. Berkhout F, Diakov A, Feiveson H, Hunt H, Lyman E, et al. 1993. Disposition of separated plutonium. Sci. Glob. Secur. 3(34):161-213
  32. Makhijani A, Makhijani A. 1995. Fissile Materials in a Glass Darkly: Technical and Policy Aspects of the Disposition of Plutonium and Highly-Enriched Uranium. Takoma Park, MD: Inst. Energy Environ. Res.
  33. Special Panel on Protection and Management of Plutonium. 1995. Protection and Management of Plutonium. LaGrange, IL: Am. Nucl. Soc.
  34. US Dep. Energy, Office of Fissile Materials Disposition. 1996. Tech. Summary Rep. Surplus Weapons-Usable Plutonium Disposition Rev. 1. Oct. 31. Washington, DC: DOE
  35. US Dep. Energy, Office of Fissile Materials Disposition. 1996. Storage and Disposition of Weapons-Usable Fissile Materials Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement. Dec. Washington, DC: DOE
  36. US Dep. Energy, Office of Arms Control and Nonproliferation. 1997. Final Non-proliferation and Arms Control Assessment of Weapons-Usable Fissile Material Storage and Excess Plutonium Disposition Alternatives. Jan. 13. Washington, DC: DOE
  37. US-Russian Plutonium Disposition Steering Committee. 1996. Joint United States-Russian Plutonium Disposition Study. Sept. Washington, DC: DOE, Off. Fissile Mater. Disposition
  38. Gibbons JH. 1994. Plutonium and international security. Presented at Public Forum Plutonium Disposition, Washington, DC
  39. Gibbons JH. 1995. Managing nuclear materials in the post-Cold-War era. Presented at 2nd Int. Policy Forum: Management Disposition Nucl. Weapons Mater., Landsdowne, VA
  40. Mark JC. 1993. Explosive properties of reactor-grade plutonium. Sci. Glob. Secur. 4:111-28
  41. Reiss M. 1995. Bridled Ambition: Why Countries Constrain Their Nuclear Capabilities. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Cent.
  42. Cochran TB, Paine CE. 1994. The Amount of Plutonium and Highly-Enriched Uranium Needed for Pure Fission Weapons. Aug. 22. Washington, DC: Nat. Resour. Defense Counc.
  43. US Dep. Energy. 1996. Plutonium: The First 50 Years. Feb. Washington, DC: DOE
  44. US General Accounting Office. 1996. Nuclear Nonproliferation: Status of U.S. Efforts to Improve Nuclear Material Controls in Newly Independent States. GAO/NSIAD/RCED-96-89. Mar. Washington, DC: US GAO
  45. Norris RS, Arkin WM. 1993. NRDC nuclear notebook: estimated nuclear stockpiles 1945-1993. Bull. At. Sci. Dec:57
  46. Norris RS, Arkin WM. 1996. NRDC nuclear notebook: U.S. nuclear weapons stockpile July 1996. Bull. At. Sci. July/Aug:61-63
  47. Cochran TB, Norris RS, Bukharin OA. 1995. Making the Russian Bomb: From Stalin to Yeltsin. Boulder, CO: Westview
  48. Canter H. 1996. Overview of the United States' plutonium inventory excess to national security needs. Presented at Int. Experts Meet. Disposition Excess Weapons Plutonium, Oct. 28-31, Paris
  49. US Dep. Defense, Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Public Affairs). 1994. DOD Review Recommends Reduction in Nuclear Force. No. 541-94. Sept. 22. Washington, DC: Dep. of Defense
  50. US General Accounting Office. 1997. Department of Energy: Plutonium Needs, Costs, and Management Programs. GAO/RCED-97-98. Apr. Washington, DC: US GAO
  51. Willrich M, Taylor TB. 1974. Nuclear Theft: Risks and Safeguards. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger
  52. US House Comm. Energy Commerce, Subcomm. Oversight and Investigations. 1986. Nuclear Weapons Facilities: Adequacy of Safeguards and Security at Department of Energy Nuclear Weapons Production Facilities. 99th Congr., 2nd Sess. Mar. 6. H. Hrg. 99-143
  53. International Atomic Energy Agency. 1980. The Convention on Physical Protection of Nuclear Material, INFCIRC 274, May, Vienna
  54. International Atomic Energy Agency. 1989. The Physical Protection of Nuclear Material, INFCIRC 225, Rev. 2. Dec. Vienna
  55. International Atomic Energy Agency. 1978. Communications from Certain Member States Regarding Guidelines for the Export of Nuclear Material, Equipment, or Technology. INFCIRC 254. Feb. Vienna
  56. Hinton JP, Barnard RW, Bennett DE, Crocker RW, Davis MJ, et al. 1996. Proliferation Vulnerability Red Team Rep. SAND97-8203, Oct., Sandia Natl. Labs., Albuquerque, NM
  57. Rohlfing JB. 1996. Testimony in Department of Defense Authorization for Appropriations for Fiscal Year 1997 and the Future Years Defense Program, pt. 7. Senate Comm. Armed Serv., 104th Congr., 2nd Sess., Mar. 13, S. Hrg. 104-532
  58. US Dep. Energy. 1997. Record of Decision for the Storage and Disposition of Weapons-Usable Fissile Materials Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement, Jan. 14, Washington, DC
  59. Jardine U. 1996. Foreign Trip Report. Contract No. W-7405-ENG-48. June 24. Livermore, CA: Lawrence Livermore Natl. Lab.
  60. Oehler G. 1995. Testimony in Intelligence Briefing on Smuggling of Nuclear Material and the Role of Crime Organizations, and on the Proliferation of Cruise and Ballistic Missiles. Senate Comm. Armed Serv. 104th Congr., 1st Sess., Jan. 31. S. Hrg. 104-35
  61. US Dep. Energy, Office of Environmental Management. 1996. Final Environmental Impact Statement on a Proposed Nuclear Weapons Nonproliferation Policy Concerning Foreign Research Reactor Spent Nuclear Fuel. DOE/EIS-0218F. Feb. Washington, DC: DOE
  62. Maslin Y. 1995. Interview: Not a single nuclear warhead has been lost or stolen in Russia. Yaderny Kontrol (Moscow) 5:9-15
  63. Bukharin O. 1994. Nuclear safeguards and security in the former Soviet Union. Survival 36(4):53-72
  64. Mueller H. 1994. Transparency in nuclear arms: toward a nuclear weapons register. Arms Control Today Oct:3-7
  65. Carnegie Commission on Preventing Deadly Conflict. 1995. Comprehensive Disclosure of Fissionable Materials: A Suggested Initiative. June. Washington, DC: Carnegie Corp.
  66. Kozyrev A. 1992. Speech to the Conf. Disarmament, Feb. 12, Geneva
  67. Paine CE, Cochran TB, Norris RS. 1996. Techniques and procedures for verifying nuclear weapons elimination. In Canberra Commission on the Elimination of Nuclear Weapons: Background Papers. Canberra, Australia: Commiss. Elimination Nucl. Weapons
  68. Moscow Summit Participants. 1996. Moscow Nuclear Safety and Security Summit Declaration. Apr. 20, Moscow
  69. International Atomic Energy Agency. 1997. Model Protocol Additional to Existing Safeguards Agreements between States and the International Atomic Energy Agency, May, Vienna
  70. Perry T. 1997. Stemming Russia's plutonium tide: cooperative efforts to convert military reactors. Nonprol. Rev. 4(2):104-14
  71. International Atomic Energy Agency. 1995. A Cut-Off Treaty and Associated Costs: An IAEA Secretariat Working Paper on Different Alternatives for the Verification of a Fissile Material Production Cut-Off Treaty and Preliminary Cost Estimates for Verification of These Alternatives. Jan. Vienna: IAEA
  72. Fetter S, von Hippel F. 1995. A step-by-step approach to a global fissile materials cutoff. Arms Control Today Oct:3-8
  73. Taylor JJ, Balent R, Barton J, Shea T. 1985. Converting nuclear weapons to peaceful use. Bull. At. Sci. Feb:35-38
  74. Amaldi E, Farinelli U, Silvi C. 1988. On the Utilization for Civilian Purposes of the Weapon-Grade Nuclear Material that May Become Available as a Result of Nuclear Disarmament. Rome: Accad. Naz. Lincei
  75. Donnelly WH, Scheinman L. 1989. Verification of a Fissile Material Production Cutoff and Disposition of Material Retired from Nuclear Warheads. Nov. Sussex, UK: Sussex Univ.--Prog. Promoting Nucl. Nonprolif.
  76. Bloomster CH, Henrickson PL, H. KM, Jonas BJ. 1990. Options and Regulatory Issues Related to Disposition of Fissile Materials from Arms Reductions. PNL-SA-1 8728. Dec. Richmond, WA: Pac. Northwest Lab.
  77. Sutcliffe WG, ed. 1991. Materials from Nuclear Arms Reductions: A Question of Disposition. CONF-910208/CTS-31-92. Livermore, CA: Lawrence Livermore Natl. Lab.
  78. Taylor JJ, Redwell E. 1992. Disposal of Fissionable Material from Dismantled Nuclear Weapons. Palo Alto, CA: Electr. Power Res. Inst.
  79. US Dep. Energy. 1996. Record of Decision for the Disposition of Surplus Highly Enriched Uranium Final Environmental Impact Statement. Aug. 5. Washington, DC: DOE
  80. US Dep. Energy, Office of Fissile Materials Disposition. 1996. Highly Enriched Uranium Disposition Plan, Rev. 0. Sept. Washington, DC: DOE
  81. Neff TL. 1991. A Grand Uranium Bargain. The New York Times, Oct. 24
  82. Allison G, Carter AB, Miller SE, Zelikow P, eds. 1993. Cooperative Denuclearization: From Pledges to Deeds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ., Cent. Sci. Int. Affairs. 293 pp.
  83. US Dep. Energy, Office of Fissile Materials Disposition. 1995. Summary Report of the Screening Process to Determine Reasonable Alternatives for Long-Term Storage and Disposition of Weapons-Usable Fissile Materials. Washington, DC: DOE
  84. National Research Council, Steering Committee on Vitrification of Radioactive Wastes, Board on Radioactive Waste Management, Commission on Geo-sciences, Environment, and Resources. 1996. Glass as a Waste Form and Vitrification Technology: Summary of an International Workshop. Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press
  85. Ewing RC, Lutze W. 1994. Materials science of radioactive waste forms. MRS Bull. Dec:16-19
  86. Glasser FP, Atkins M. 1994. Cements in radioactive waste disposal. MRS Bull. Dec:33-38
  87. Grambow B. 1994. Borosilicate glass: Future research requirements or "what we don't know." MRS Bull. Dec:20-23
  88. Vance ER. 1994. Synroc: A suitable waste form for actinides. MRS Bull. Dec:28-32
  89. US Dep. Energy. 1995. Plutonium Stabilization and Immobilization Workshop. CONF-951259. Washington, DC: DOE
  90. US Dep. Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy. 1993. Disposition Study: Technical Review Committee Report. July 2. Washington, DC: DOE
  91. Westinghouse Electric Corp. 1993. PDR 600 Plutonium Disposition Study. DOE/SF/19683-1. May 15. San Francisco: Westinghouse Electr. Corp.
  92. ABB-Combustion Engineering. 1993. Pu Consumption in LWRs: DOE Plutonium Disposition Study: Final Report. May 15. Windsor, CT: ABB-Combustion Eng.
  93. General Electric Nuclear Energy. 1993. Study of Pu Consumption in Advanced Light Water Reactors: Evaluation of GE Advanced Boiling Water Reactor Plants. DE-ACO3-93SF19681 NEDO 3235 1. May 13. San Francisco: Gen. Electr. Nucl. Energy
  94. Sterbentz JW, Olsen CS, Sinha UP. 1993. Weapons-Grade Plutonium Dispositioning, Volume 4: Plutonium Dispositioning in Light Water Reactors. DOE/ID- 10422. June. Idaho Falls: Idaho Natl. Eng. Lab.
  95. General Atomics. 1993. MHTGR Plutonium Consumption Study— Final Report. DE-AC03-89SF-17885. May 14. San Diego: General Atomics
  96. General Atomics. 1994. MHTGR Plutonium Consumption Study, Phase II Final Report. GA/DOE-051-94. June 1. San Diego: General Atomics
  97. General Electric Nuclear Energy, Argonne National Lab. 1993. ALMR Plutonium Disposition Study. GEFR-00919. May. San Francisco: Argonne Natl. Lab.
  98. National Research Council, Committee on Separations Technology and Transmutation Systems, Board on Radioactive Waste Management, Committee on Geo-sciences, Environment, and Resources. 1996. Nuclear Wastes: Technologies for Separations and Transmutation. Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press
  99. Cornwall J, Eardley D, Garwin R, Koonin S, MacDonald G, et al. 1994. Accelerator-Based Conversion of Plutonium. JSR-94-310. McLean, VA: JASON-MITRE Corp.
  100. Hollister CD, Anderson RD, Heath RG. 1981. Subseabed disposal of nuclear wastes. Science 213:1321-26 101.
  101. US Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. 1986. Subseabed Disposal of Radioactive Waste. May. Washington, DC: Gov. Print. Off.
  102. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Nuclear Energy Agency. 1988. Feasibility of Disposal of High-Level Radioactive Waste in the Seabed. Paris: OECD
  103. Battelle Columbus Lab. 1980. Analysis of Nuclear Disposal in Space. Mar. 31. Columbus, OH: Battelle Columbus Labs.
  104. Trutnev YA, Chemyshev AK. 1992. Presentation at 4th Int. Workshop Nucl. Warhead Elimination and Nonproliferation, Feb. 26-27. Washington, DC: Natural Resour. Defense Counc.
  105. Cowell BS. 1995. Survey of Worldwide Light Water Reactor Experience With Mixed Uranium-Plutonium Oxide Fuel. ORNUMD/LTR-40. Oct. 11. Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge Natl. Lab.
  106. Greene SR, Bevard BB, Byerly SL, Fisher SE, Ludwig SB, et al. 1996. FMDP Reactor Alternative Summary Report: Vol. 1— Existing LWR Alternative. ORNL/TM-13275/V1. Oct. 7. Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge Natl. Lab.
  107. ABB-Combustion Engineering. 1994. DOE Plutonium Disposition Study: Analysis of Existing ABB-CE Light Water Reactors for the Disposition of Weapons-Grade Plutonium. DE-AC03-93SF19682. June 1. Windsor, CT: ABB-Combust. Eng.
  108. General Electric. 1994. Study of Plutonium Disposition Using Existing GE Advanced Boiling Water Reactors. DE-AC03-93SF19681. June 1. San Francisco: GE
  109. Westinghouse Electric Corporation. 1994. Plutonium Disposition in Existing Pressurized Water Reactors. DE-AC03-93SF19683. June 1. San Francisco: Westinghouse Electric Corp.
  110. Greene SR, Spellman DJ, Bevard BB, Byerly SL, Fisher SE, et al. 1996. FMDP Reactor Alternative Summary Report: Vol. 2— CANDU Heavy Water Reactor Alternative. ORNL/TM-13275/V2. Sept. Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge Natl. Lab.
  111. AECL Technologies. 1996. Optimization and Implementation Study of Plutonium Disposition, Using Existing CANDU Reactors. DE-AC03-94SF20218. Sept. Rockville, MD: AECL Technol.
  112. Delegations of France, Germany, and Russia. 1996. Joint statement. Presented at Int. Experts Meet. Safe Effective Management Weapons Fissile Mater. Designated As No Longer Required For Defense Purposes, Oct. 28, Paris
  113. Lyman ES, Leventhal P. 1997. Bury the stuff. Bull. At. Sci. Mar./Apr:45-48
  114. Holdren JP, Aheame JF, Garwin RL, Panofsky WKH,Taylor JJ, Bunn M. 1996. Excess weapons plutonium: how to reduce a clear and present danger. Arms Control Today Nov./Dec: 3-9
  115. Clinton W. 1997. Letter to Representative Edward Markey. Feb. 5
  116. US Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. 1977. Nuclear Proliferation and Safeguards. Washington, DC: US Gov. Print. Off.
  117. Scheinman L. 1987. The International Atomic Energy Agency and World Nuclear Order. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press
  118. Holdren JP. 1989. Civilian nuclear technologies and nuclear weapons proliferation. In New Technologies and the Arms Race, ed. C Schaerf, B Holden-Reid, D Carlton, pp. 161-98. London: Macmillan
  119. Linsey G, Fattah A. 1994. The interface between nuclear safeguards and radioactive waste disposal. IAEA Bull. 36(2):22-26
  120. Peterson PF. 1996. Long-term safeguards for plutonium in geologic repositories. Sci. Glob. Secur. 6(1):1-29
  121. Lyman ES. 1994. A perspective on the proliferation risks of plutonium mines. Presented at US Dep. Energy Plutonium Stabilization and Immobilization Workshop, Dec. 14, Washington, DC
  122. Feiveson HA. 1978. Proliferation-resistant fuel cycles. Annu. Rev. Energy 3:357-94
  123. Albright D, Feiveson HA. 1988. Plutonium recycling and the problem of nuclear proliferation. Annu. Rev. Energy 13:239-65
  124. National Research Council, Committee to Assess the International Science and Technology Center. 1996. An Assessment of the International Science and Technology Center: Redirecting Expertise in Weapons of Mass Destruction in the Former Soviet Union. Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press
  125. US Dep. Energy, Industrial Partnering Program. 1996. New Independent States Industrial Partnering Program— Reducing the Nuclear Danger. Mar. 22. Washington, DC: Dep. Energy
  126. Bukharin O. 1997. The future of Russia's plutonium cities. Int. Secur. 21(4):126-58
  127. US House of Representatives. 1996. Congressional Record. 104. H9071, July 30. 8 pp.
  128. Bunn M. 1996. Getting the plutonium disposition job done: the concept of a joint-venture disposition enterprise financed by additional sales of highly enriched uranium. In Science for Peace Series Vol. 1: International Conference on Military Conversion and Science: "Utilization-Disposal of the Excess Fissile Weapons Materials: Scientific, Technological, and Socio-Economic Aspects," ed. V Kous-minov, M Martellini, pp. 201-13. Como, Italy: UNESCO Venice Off.


The latest from Belfer
See more
Up Next