Presentation

Options for Limiting the Security Risks from a Negotiated Nuclear Settlement with Iran

| September 22, 2009

Matthew Bunn considers the premises, facts, and risks underlying negotiation with Iran over their nuclear program. He describes a range of options for limiting the risks of a negotiated settlement with Iran. Bunn suggests that insisting on zero centrifuges is likely to lead to no agreement. It is time to begin thinking about what the lowest risk, non-zero options may look like.

Click below to download the presentation.

Downloads

For more information on this publication: Belfer Communications Office
For Academic Citation: Bunn, Matthew. “Options for Limiting the Security Risks from a Negotiated Nuclear Settlement with Iran.” Presentation, September 22, 2009. (presented at Project on Managing the Atom Seminar, Cambridge, Mass.).

The Author

Recommended
In the Spotlight
RSS
A detailed look at China’s development of a hydrogen bomb in fewer than three years, quicker than all other initial nuclear weapons states.
'New Cold Wars' are “more complex, more dangerous than the old one, because China and Russia are teaming up together.”
While U.S. media reports blame Iran and its drone attacks for “pouring gasoline on a region that is already in flames,” there's a lot more to the story, and “most of it reflects poorly on the United States.”
Most Viewed

Tags