Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School

Transcending Mutual Deterrence in the U.S.-Russian Relationship

| September 30, 2013

Introduction

Even as this paper was being written and edited, U.S.-Russian relations have warmed and chilled. Today, as we are about to go to press, marks a particularly chilly period in recent history, with the cancellation of a planned Moscow Summit in September 2013. To some, this cold spell might signal an inapt moment to consider issues related to transcending mutual deterrence. Such a view would overlook the aims of the paper, which attempts to assess the central and enduring interests of the United States and Russia, the extent to which they coincide or conflict, and whether or not in light of these interests mutual deterrence should remain a fundamental feature of the relationship.  The analysis and recommendations offered below are based on a long-term view.  The inevitable and transitory changes in the U.S.-Russian relationship cannot gainsay them.  Indeed, at moments of temporary frustration or elation it is most important to think strategically about central and enduring national interests and how best to secure them.

A PDF of the full report is available here:

Downloads

For more information on this publication: Belfer Communications Office
For Academic Citation: Bunn, Matthew, Valentin Kuznetsov, Yuri Morozov, Gary Samore, Simon Saradzhyan, William H. Tobey, Viktor I. Yesin, and Pavel S. Zolotarev. “Transcending Mutual Deterrence in the U.S.-Russian Relationship.” Paper, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School, September 30, 2013.

The Authors

Kuznetsov Valentin

Yuri Morozov

Gary Samore

Gary Samore

  • Senior Fellow, Korea Project
  • Former Executive Director for Research, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs
  • Affiliate, Project on Managing the Atom
Expertise:

Viktor I. Yesin

Pavel S. Zolotarev

Recommended
In the Spotlight
RSS
More open-sourced technology means that those who wish to use it for nefarious purposes have the same access to the technology as anyone else, write Bruce Schneier and James Waldo.
As more of society’s critical functions go digital, government must protect individuals' ability to perceive, judge, and trust or distrust things with which they interact, argues Steve Johnson.
This paper by Svenja Kirsch and Bethan Saunders proposes policy recommendations to enhance transatlantic coordination and cooperation against cyber-related threats by Russia and China.
Most Viewed

Tags