Journal Article - Research Policy
Why Matter Matters: How Technology Characteristics Shape the Strategic Framing of Technologies
Abstract
Previous work stresses that actors use strategic technology framing—i.e. purposeful language and rhetoric—to shape technology expectations, persuade stakeholders, and influence the evolution of technologies along their life-cycle. Currently, however, the literature predominantly describes strategic technology framing as a sociopolitical process, and provides only limited insights into how the framing itself is shaped by the material characteristics of the technologies being framed. To address this shortcoming, we conducted a comparative, longitudinal case study of two leading research organizations in the United States and Germany pursuing competing solar photovoltaic (PV) technologies to examine how technology characteristics shape the strategic framing of technologies. We show that to frame PV technologies in their own favor, executives made use of four framing dimensions (potential, prospect, performance, and progress) and three framing tactics (conclusion, conditioning, and concession). Moreover, we show that which framing dimensions and tactics actors selected depended on the maturity and evolution of the technology they pursued, respectively. By highlighting how technology characteristics shape strategic technology framing, we contribute to the literatures on social movements, institutional entrepreneurship, and impression management. Additionally, by providing a coherent framework of strategic technology framing, our study complements existing findings in the literature on the sociology of expectations and contributes to a better understanding of how technology hypes emerge.
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via Research Policy.
For more information on this publication:
Please contact
Science, Technology, and Public Policy
For Academic Citation:
Hoppmann, Joern, Laura Diaz Anadon, and Venkatesh "Venky" Narayanamurti. "Why Matter Matters: How Technology Characteristics Shape the Strategic Framing of Technologies." Research Policy, vol. 49. no. 1. (February 2020).
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Journal Article
- Research Policy
Governments as Partners: The Role of Alliances in U.S. Cleantech Startup Innovation
Journal Article
- Nature
Six Principles for Public Energy Innovation Programs
Journal Article
- Research Policy
Compulsive Policy-making—The Evolution of the German Feed-in Tariff System for Solar Photovoltaic Power
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Saudi First
Magazine Article
- Der Tagesspiegel
Background: Ivan Arreguín-Toft
Analysis & Opinions
- Foreign Policy
The Morality of Ukraine's War Is Very Murky
Abstract
Previous work stresses that actors use strategic technology framing—i.e. purposeful language and rhetoric—to shape technology expectations, persuade stakeholders, and influence the evolution of technologies along their life-cycle. Currently, however, the literature predominantly describes strategic technology framing as a sociopolitical process, and provides only limited insights into how the framing itself is shaped by the material characteristics of the technologies being framed. To address this shortcoming, we conducted a comparative, longitudinal case study of two leading research organizations in the United States and Germany pursuing competing solar photovoltaic (PV) technologies to examine how technology characteristics shape the strategic framing of technologies. We show that to frame PV technologies in their own favor, executives made use of four framing dimensions (potential, prospect, performance, and progress) and three framing tactics (conclusion, conditioning, and concession). Moreover, we show that which framing dimensions and tactics actors selected depended on the maturity and evolution of the technology they pursued, respectively. By highlighting how technology characteristics shape strategic technology framing, we contribute to the literatures on social movements, institutional entrepreneurship, and impression management. Additionally, by providing a coherent framework of strategic technology framing, our study complements existing findings in the literature on the sociology of expectations and contributes to a better understanding of how technology hypes emerge.
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via Research Policy.Hoppmann, Joern, Laura Diaz Anadon, and Venkatesh "Venky" Narayanamurti. "Why Matter Matters: How Technology Characteristics Shape the Strategic Framing of Technologies." Research Policy, vol. 49. no. 1. (February 2020).
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Journal Article - Research Policy
Governments as Partners: The Role of Alliances in U.S. Cleantech Startup Innovation
Journal Article - Nature
Six Principles for Public Energy Innovation Programs
Journal Article - Research Policy
Compulsive Policy-making—The Evolution of the German Feed-in Tariff System for Solar Photovoltaic Power
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Saudi First
Magazine Article - Der Tagesspiegel
Background: Ivan Arreguín-Toft
Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Policy
The Morality of Ukraine's War Is Very Murky