Journal Article - Nuclear Technology
The Economics of Reprocessing Versus Direct Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel
We assess the economics of reprocessing versus direct disposal of spent fuel. The uranium price at which reprocessing spent fuel from light water reactors (LWRs) and recycling the resulting plutonium and uranium in LWRs would become economic is estimated for a range of reprocessing prices and other fuel cycle costs. The contribution of both fuel cycle options to the cost of electricity is also estimated. A similar analysis is performed to compare fast neutron reactors (FRs) with LWRs. We review available information about various fuel cycle costs, as well as the quantities of uranium likely to be recoverable at a range of future prices. We conclude that the once-through LWR fuel cycle is likely to remain significantly cheaper than recycling in either LWRs or FRs for at least the next 50 yr, even with substantial growth in nuclear power.
For more information on this publication:
Please contact
Managing the Atom
For Academic Citation:
Bunn, Matthew, John P. Holdren, Steve Fetter, and Bob van der Zwaan. “The Economics of Reprocessing Versus Direct Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel.” Nuclear Technology, vol. 150. (June 2005): 209-230 .
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions
- The Hill
Hiroshima 75 Years Later: The Fallout Continues
Analysis & Opinions
- At the Brink
At the Brink: Loose Nukes
Paper
- Institute for Nuclear Materials Management
IAEA Nuclear Security Recommendations (INFCIRC/225): The Next Generation
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy
We assess the economics of reprocessing versus direct disposal of spent fuel. The uranium price at which reprocessing spent fuel from light water reactors (LWRs) and recycling the resulting plutonium and uranium in LWRs would become economic is estimated for a range of reprocessing prices and other fuel cycle costs. The contribution of both fuel cycle options to the cost of electricity is also estimated. A similar analysis is performed to compare fast neutron reactors (FRs) with LWRs. We review available information about various fuel cycle costs, as well as the quantities of uranium likely to be recoverable at a range of future prices. We conclude that the once-through LWR fuel cycle is likely to remain significantly cheaper than recycling in either LWRs or FRs for at least the next 50 yr, even with substantial growth in nuclear power.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions - The Hill
Hiroshima 75 Years Later: The Fallout Continues
Analysis & Opinions - At the Brink
At the Brink: Loose Nukes
Paper - Institute for Nuclear Materials Management
IAEA Nuclear Security Recommendations (INFCIRC/225): The Next Generation
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief - Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy


