Journal Article - Texas National Security Review
Book Review Roundtable: Tempting Fate
Why would a state that lacks nuclear weapons choose to fight a state that has them? In this roundtable, four scholars evaluate Paul Avey's explanation for this phenomenon.
Overview
Introduction: Crucial Calculations: Examining the Decision-Making Behind Nuclear Use in War by Rupal N. Mehta
1. The Limits of the Nuclear Shadow by Ariel F.W. Petrovics
2. What Military Confrontations Could Mean for Understanding the Nuclear Revolution by Alexander Lanoszka
3. Shedding Light on Nuclear Conflict by Reid Pauly
Introduction: Crucial Calculations: Examining the Decision-Making Behind Nuclear Use in War
Rupal N. Mehta
Paul Avey’s new book Tempting Fate: Why Nonnuclear States Confront Nuclear Opponents answers one of the most important questions in grand strategy and nuclear security: Why do nuclear and non-nuclear states go to war?1 Anchored in the canonical literature on the consequences of nuclear weapons proliferation and contemporaneous debates about how these weapons can change the calculus of combat in wartime, Avey employs a methodical approach that produces a range of explanations about the variables impacting conflict.2 In addition to systematically addressing the limitations of existing explanations and drawing several counterintuitive conclusions, Avey clearly and persuasively details how conventionally inferior non-nuclear weapons states may possess an advantage in disputes with nuclear powers....
2 Bernard Brodie, ed, The Absolute Weapon: Atomic Power and World Order (New York, N.Y.: Harcourt, Brace & Co Press, 1946); Kyle Beardsley and Victor Asal, "Winning with the Bomb," Journal of Conflict Resolution 53, no 2, (2009), 278–301, https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0022002708330386; Thomas C. Schelling, The Strategy of Conflict (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1960); James Fearon, "Rationalist Explanations for War," International Organization 4, no. 2 (Summer, 1995), 79–414, https://www.jstor.org/stable/2706903.
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via Texas National Security Review.
For more information on this publication:
Please contact
International Security
For Academic Citation:
Mehta, Rupal N., Ariel F.W. Petrovics, Alexander Lanoszka, and Reid Pauly. "Book Review Roundtable: Tempting Fate." Texas National Security Review, (August 17, 2020).
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Video
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
Author Chat: Reid Pauly
Journal Article
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
Would U.S. Leaders Push the Button? Wargames and the Sources of Nuclear Restraint
Journal Article
- International Security
Confronting Soviet Power: U.S. Policy during the Early Cold War
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Journal Article
- Research Policy
The Relationship Between Science and Technology
Analysis & Opinions
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
AI and Trust
Analysis & Opinions
- Project Syndicate
What Caused the Ukraine War?
Overview
Introduction: Crucial Calculations: Examining the Decision-Making Behind Nuclear Use in War by Rupal N. Mehta
1. The Limits of the Nuclear Shadow by Ariel F.W. Petrovics
2. What Military Confrontations Could Mean for Understanding the Nuclear Revolution by Alexander Lanoszka
3. Shedding Light on Nuclear Conflict by Reid Pauly
Introduction: Crucial Calculations: Examining the Decision-Making Behind Nuclear Use in War
Rupal N. Mehta
Paul Avey’s new book Tempting Fate: Why Nonnuclear States Confront Nuclear Opponents answers one of the most important questions in grand strategy and nuclear security: Why do nuclear and non-nuclear states go to war?1 Anchored in the canonical literature on the consequences of nuclear weapons proliferation and contemporaneous debates about how these weapons can change the calculus of combat in wartime, Avey employs a methodical approach that produces a range of explanations about the variables impacting conflict.2 In addition to systematically addressing the limitations of existing explanations and drawing several counterintuitive conclusions, Avey clearly and persuasively details how conventionally inferior non-nuclear weapons states may possess an advantage in disputes with nuclear powers....
2 Bernard Brodie, ed, The Absolute Weapon: Atomic Power and World Order (New York, N.Y.: Harcourt, Brace & Co Press, 1946); Kyle Beardsley and Victor Asal, "Winning with the Bomb," Journal of Conflict Resolution 53, no 2, (2009), 278–301, https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0022002708330386; Thomas C. Schelling, The Strategy of Conflict (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1960); James Fearon, "Rationalist Explanations for War," International Organization 4, no. 2 (Summer, 1995), 79–414, https://www.jstor.org/stable/2706903.
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via Texas National Security Review.Mehta, Rupal N., Ariel F.W. Petrovics, Alexander Lanoszka, and Reid Pauly. "Book Review Roundtable: Tempting Fate." Texas National Security Review, (August 17, 2020).
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Video - Quarterly Journal: International Security
Author Chat: Reid Pauly
Journal Article - Quarterly Journal: International Security
Would U.S. Leaders Push the Button? Wargames and the Sources of Nuclear Restraint
Journal Article - International Security
Confronting Soviet Power: U.S. Policy during the Early Cold War
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Journal Article - Research Policy
The Relationship Between Science and Technology
Analysis & Opinions - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
AI and Trust
Analysis & Opinions - Project Syndicate
What Caused the Ukraine War?