Discussion Paper - Harvard Project on Climate Agreements
Environmental Benefit-Cost Analysis: A Comparative Analysis Between the United States and the United Kingdom
Abstract
The United States and United Kingdom have longstanding traditions in use of environmental benefit-cost analysis (E-BCA). While there are similarities between how E-BCA is utilized, there are significant differences too, many of which mirror ongoing debates and recent developments in the literature on environmental and natural resource economics. We review the use of E-BCA in both countries across three themes: (a) the role of long-term discounting; (b) the estimation and use of carbon valuation; and, (c) the estimation and use of the value of a statistical life. In each case, we discuss how academic developments are (and are not) translated into use and draw comparative lessons. We find that, in some cases, practical differences in E-BCA can be overstated, although in others these seem more substantive. Advances in the academic frontier also raise the question of when and how to update practical E-BCA, with very different answers across our themes.
Joseph E. Aldy
Harvard University
Giles Atkinson
London School of Economics and Political Science
Matthew Kotchen
Yale University
For more information on this publication:
Please contact
Harvard Project on Climate Agreements
For Academic Citation:
Aldy, Joseph, Giles Atkinson and Matthew Kotchen. “Environmental Benefit-Cost Analysis: A Comparative Analysis Between the United States and the United Kingdom.” Discussion Paper, 21-100, Harvard Project on Climate Agreements, January 2021.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Discussion Paper
- Harvard Project on Climate Agreements
Co-Benefits and Regulatory Impact Analysis: Theory and Evidence from Federal Air Quality Regulations
Journal Article
- Journal of Economic Perspectives
Policy Evolution Under the Clean Air Act
Book
- Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc.
Economics of the Environment: Selected Readings
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
AI and Trust
Journal Article
- Research Policy
The Relationship Between Science and Technology
Policy Brief
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
Nonfatal Casualties and the Changing Costs of War
Abstract
The United States and United Kingdom have longstanding traditions in use of environmental benefit-cost analysis (E-BCA). While there are similarities between how E-BCA is utilized, there are significant differences too, many of which mirror ongoing debates and recent developments in the literature on environmental and natural resource economics. We review the use of E-BCA in both countries across three themes: (a) the role of long-term discounting; (b) the estimation and use of carbon valuation; and, (c) the estimation and use of the value of a statistical life. In each case, we discuss how academic developments are (and are not) translated into use and draw comparative lessons. We find that, in some cases, practical differences in E-BCA can be overstated, although in others these seem more substantive. Advances in the academic frontier also raise the question of when and how to update practical E-BCA, with very different answers across our themes.
Joseph E. Aldy
Harvard University
Giles Atkinson
London School of Economics and Political Science
Matthew Kotchen
Yale University
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Discussion Paper - Harvard Project on Climate Agreements
Co-Benefits and Regulatory Impact Analysis: Theory and Evidence from Federal Air Quality Regulations
Journal Article - Journal of Economic Perspectives
Policy Evolution Under the Clean Air Act
Book - Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc.
Economics of the Environment: Selected Readings
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
AI and Trust
Journal Article - Research Policy
The Relationship Between Science and Technology
Policy Brief - Quarterly Journal: International Security
Nonfatal Casualties and the Changing Costs of War