Journal Article - Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament
The Nuclear Fuel Cycle and the Proliferation ‘Danger Zone’
Horizontal nuclear proliferation presents what is sometimes referred to as the "Nth country problem," or identifying which state could be next to acquire nuclear weapons. Nuclear fuel cycle technologies can contribute to both nuclear power generation and weapons development. Consequently, observers often view civilian nuclear programs with suspicion even as research on nuclear latency and the technological inputs of proliferation has added nuance to these discussions. To contribute to this debate, I put forth a simple theoretical proposition: En route to developing a civilian nuclear infrastructure and mastering the fuel cycle, states pass through a proliferation "danger zone." States with fuel cycle capabilities below a certain threshold will likely be unable to proliferate. States that pass through the "danger zone" without proliferating will be unlikely to do so in the future. I support this proposition by introducing preliminary analysis from the Nuclear Fuel Cycle (NFC) Index, a new heuristic tool to complement political assessments of the connection between civilian nuclear energy development and nuclear weapons proliferation. I conclude with policy implications for contemporary Iran, Saudi Arabia, Japan, and South Korea. Taken together, this article calls for increased policymaker interaction with historical cases and more sophisticated academic engagement with the nuclear fuel cycle.
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament.
For more information on this publication:
Please contact
International Security
For Academic Citation:
Herzog, Stephen . "The Nuclear Fuel Cycle and the Proliferation 'Danger Zone'." Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament, vol. 3. no. 1. (2020): 60–86.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions
- Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
Poll: What the American Public Likes and Hates about Trump's Nuclear Policies
Journal Article
- Nonproliferation Review
Gas, Norms, and Statistics: The Jury is Still Out
Journal Article
- H-Diplo
Herzog on Yeo, 'Asia's Regional Architecture: Alliances and Institutions in the Pacific Century'
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions
- Project Syndicate
What Caused the Ukraine War?
Analysis & Opinions
- New Straits Times
Gorbachev and the End of the Cold War
Horizontal nuclear proliferation presents what is sometimes referred to as the "Nth country problem," or identifying which state could be next to acquire nuclear weapons. Nuclear fuel cycle technologies can contribute to both nuclear power generation and weapons development. Consequently, observers often view civilian nuclear programs with suspicion even as research on nuclear latency and the technological inputs of proliferation has added nuance to these discussions. To contribute to this debate, I put forth a simple theoretical proposition: En route to developing a civilian nuclear infrastructure and mastering the fuel cycle, states pass through a proliferation "danger zone." States with fuel cycle capabilities below a certain threshold will likely be unable to proliferate. States that pass through the "danger zone" without proliferating will be unlikely to do so in the future. I support this proposition by introducing preliminary analysis from the Nuclear Fuel Cycle (NFC) Index, a new heuristic tool to complement political assessments of the connection between civilian nuclear energy development and nuclear weapons proliferation. I conclude with policy implications for contemporary Iran, Saudi Arabia, Japan, and South Korea. Taken together, this article calls for increased policymaker interaction with historical cases and more sophisticated academic engagement with the nuclear fuel cycle.
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament.Herzog, Stephen . "The Nuclear Fuel Cycle and the Proliferation 'Danger Zone'." Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament, vol. 3. no. 1. (2020): 60–86.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions - Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
Poll: What the American Public Likes and Hates about Trump's Nuclear Policies
Journal Article - Nonproliferation Review
Gas, Norms, and Statistics: The Jury is Still Out
Journal Article - H-Diplo
Herzog on Yeo, 'Asia's Regional Architecture: Alliances and Institutions in the Pacific Century'
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions - Project Syndicate
What Caused the Ukraine War?
Analysis & Opinions - New Straits Times
Gorbachev and the End of the Cold War