Report - Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The Future of Nuclear Power: An Interdisciplinary MIT Study

| July 2003

Introduction

An interdisciplinary MIT faculty group decided to study the future of nuclear power because of a belief that this technology is an important option for the United States and the world to meet future energy needs without emitting carbon dioxide and other atmospheric pollutants. Other options include increased efficiency, renewables, and carbon sequestration, and all may be needed for a successful greenhouse gas management strategy. This study, addressed to government, industry, and academic leaders, discusses the interrelated technical, economic, environmental, and political challenges facing a significant increase in global nuclear power utilization over the next half century and what might be done to overcome those challenges.

This study was supported by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation and by MIT's Office of the Provost and Laboratory for Energy and the Environment.

Want to Read More?

The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.
Read Full Article
For more information on this publication: Belfer Communications Office
For Academic Citation: Deutch, John (Co-Chair), Ernest J. Moniz, (Co-Chair), Stephen Ansolabehere, Michael Driscoll, Paul E. Gray, John P. Holdren, Paul L. Joskow, Richard K. Lester, and Neil E. Todreas. “The Future of Nuclear Power: An Interdisciplinary MIT Study.” Massachusetts Institute of Technology, July 2003.

The Authors

John P. Holdren

John P. Holdren

  • Teresa and John Heinz Research Professor of Environmental Policy, Harvard Kennedy School
  • Co-Director, Science, Technology and Public Policy Program
  • Member of the Board, Belfer Center
  • President Obama's Science Advisor and Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (January 2009 – January 2017)
Expertise:
Recommended
In the Spotlight
RSS
By 2050, DACCS appears likely to remove only about 1% of current emissions of fossil carbon, making only a small contribution to meeting 2050 net zero targets, write Mohammed Al-Juaied and Adam Whitmore.
As much as we laud LBJ’s political prowess in moving domestic legislation, some of those same attributes led him and the nation deeper into the jungles of Vietnam, write Fredrik Logevall and Julian Zelizer.
The most likely result of a Trump administration for Ukraine may be radically diminished U.S. support, causing Russia to make new battlefield gains and perhaps an imposed peace, writes Anatol Lieven in Russia Matters.
Most Viewed

Tags